Case Studies

Explore landmark judgments and legal precedents with comprehensive analysis, insights, and implications for modern legal practice.

Showing 3 of 3 case studies

Filtered results
Property Law

Ameer Minhaj v. Ddierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar: Admissibility of Unregistered Agreements and Section 53A Protection

Civil Appeal No. 12345 of 2018Supreme Court of India

This landmark case addresses the critical distinction between the admissibility of unregistered agreements in specific performance suits and their ineffectiveness in claiming statutory protections under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. The Supreme Court clarified that while unregistered agreements can be used as evidence of a contract in specific performance suits, they do not confer any rights under the doctrine of part performance, which requires registration. The judgment provides essential guidance for parties involved in property transactions, emphasizing the importance of registration for full legal protection while ensuring that contractual obligations can still be enforced through specific performance.

Petitioner:Ameer Minhaj
Respondent:Ddierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar
Property LawSpecific PerformanceUnregistered Agreements+6 more
01/01/2018
12 min read
Constitutional Law

Puttaswamy v. Union of India: A Landmark Case on the Right to Privacy

W.P.(C) No. 494/2012Supreme Court of India

The case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2017) stands as one of the most significant constitutional law judgments in Indian legal history. This landmark case established the fundamental right to privacy as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India, in a unanimous decision, overruled previous judgments that had held privacy not to be a fundamental right and laid down a comprehensive framework for privacy protection in the digital age.

Petitioner:Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.)
Respondent:Union of India
Right to PrivacyFundamental RightsConstitutional Law+17 more
24/08/2017
20 min read
Constitutional Law

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION vs UNION OF INDIA

W.P.(C) No. 1022/1989Supreme Court of India

This landmark case addressed the critical issue of judicial independence and the need for better service conditions for judicial officers across India. The Supreme Court, recognizing the fundamental importance of an independent judiciary, issued comprehensive directions for establishing the All India Judicial Service and improving the working conditions of judicial officers. The judgment emphasized that judicial independence is not just a constitutional mandate but a prerequisite for the effective functioning of democracy and the rule of law.

Petitioner:All India Judges Association
Respondent:Union of India
Judicial IndependenceAll India Judicial ServiceJudicial Administration+5 more
13/03/1992
15 min read